SURVEY
​
My study is interested in considering the cultural expectations in rhetoric and composition graduate programs and how those expectations shape disabled graduate students’ experiences. I’m particularly invested in how disability and ableism impact how graduate students construct their professional and scholarly identity in the discipline, as a disabled graduate student myself. Graduate students are an understudied and often neglected population. So, this study hopes to lend insight into ableism in graduate education and how graduate programs can better create a culture of access in their programs. The research questions driving this study are as follows:
1. How do cultural expectations and discursive notions of productivity, efficiency, and ability impact disabled graduate students’ identity construction as they negotiate liminal spaces between teaching, research, and community?
2. How can listening to the ways that disabled graduate students practice resistance lead to structural recommendations for graduate programs that prioritize collective care and the development of a culture of access?
Eligible participants of this study will be:
-
18 years or older
-
Currently enrolled as a graduate student in a rhetoric and composition program or track in the United States
-
Have a computer and working internet access to Zoom
This survey should take about 30 minutes to complete. The survey link will be live until 11:59 pm ET on February 12, 2024, so you may consent and participate anytime within that time frame. At the end of the survey, you will be able to indicate if you are interested in participating in a 60-minute remote interview via Zoom. To be eligible for the interview portion of this study, you must have access to Zoom and consent to being audio- and video-recorded.
Participants who are asked to interview for the study will be compensated for their time and labor with a $5 Amazon gift card.
Here is a link to the survey. If this link does not work, please copy and paste this link into your browser: https://syracuseuniversity.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_55rtnpL0SCjkIqa.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Disabling Structures: Disability and Graduate Student Professionalization
Through a careful analysis of the cultural expectations around normativity, ability, and productivity that are implicitly and explicitly delineated in graduate programs, my dissertation explores how these expectations influence disabled graduate students' professionalization in the discipline and what kinds of resistance disabled graduate students have employed to meet their access need. My analysis of how disability influences graduate students' professional identity construction offers insight into how graduate programs can critically think through program-level policy in graduate education in ways that center disability justice and care.
An understudied and often neglected and precarious population, disabled graduate students’ experiences are critical to graduate education scholarship because their lived experiences can offer insight into critiques of normative and disabling academic structures. My dissertation will explore common and shared cultural expectations across doctoral programs in rhetoric and composition. This is important because disabled graduate students' identity construction presents important implications for broader academic contexts by exploring how ableism circulates through micro and macro cultural expectations and material-discursive notions about productivity, efficiency, and ability. This is especially true given the ways that “disability is always shifting, contingent on circumstances, contexts, and particular experiences, relationships, and bodily arrangements'' (Kerschbaum Signs of Disability 11).
​
Through this study, I will explore how the conclusions I draw from disabled graduate students’ experiences might inform and generate structural recommendations that take access, care, and disability justice seriously in graduate education. While I intend to propose structural suggestions around creating a culture of access that integrates the perspectives of disabled graduate students, my focus in the dissertation is not specifically on policy. This is important because my decision to focus on story and lived experience is a political one; many universities argue that their diversity and inclusion initiatives are inclusive of disabled students and that they actively support disabled students by following ADA policy and allowing for reasonable accommodations, and yet ableism continues to remain a defining feature of so many disabled academics experiences. Stories enable disabled graduate students to tell a different narrative about disability in higher education.
Exigence
As a graduate student– especially as a first-generation college graduate whose family has been denied or restricted access to education– I am interested in the processes of becoming that graduate students engage as they undergo their doctoral studies. This research is especially important given, as Haley notes, “the widening gap between the expectations laid on graduate students’ shoulders and the institutional support made – or not made– available to them” (179). Many of my experiences, and the experiences of those around me during graduate school, have been marked by trauma. This fact only increases the urgency of my dissertation; graduate school shouldn’t inherently be traumatic; how do we generate a praxis towards doctoral education based on care, openness, reinvention, unlearning, accessibility, inclusivity, and radical transparency?